Friday, March 20, 2009

Obama Administration Fuels Inflation

As people around the world lose confidence in Obama's ability to deal with America's economic crisis, his administration's decision to "turn on the printing presses" and dilute the value of our nation's dollars with more worthless paper has ignited fears of inflation.

Market Watch, March 19, 2009...

Gold rallies 8% as Fed move fuels inflation fears

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Gold futures rallied more than 8% Thursday to end near $960 an ounce, as the Federal Reserve's plans to purchase as much as $1.15 trillion in U.S. bonds and mortgage-backed securities sparked worries of inflation ahead, raising gold's appeal as a hedge against rising prices.

"Looking ahead, we fear inflation. It may be that Dr. Bernankenstein has created a monster beyond his control," said Michael Farr, president of Farr, Miller & Washington, referring to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.

The U.S. dollar's losses in the wake of the Fed's move also lifted gold prices, with a weaker greenback raising gold's investment appeal.

As Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina noted, March 16, 2009...

... the problem of too much debt cannot be solved with more debt. ...if you print enough of anything, you cheapen it. We’re out there running the printing press essentially on a currency and we’re cheapening it. You can go back to the 1920s with what happened to Argentina. You can go back to the time between World War I and World War II when it happened in the Weimar Republic in Germany. When it happened there, you needed a wheelbarrow load of currency to get so much as a loaf of bread.

We’re nearing a very scary tipping point, the point at which the international markets stop buying our debt. ...we get to that point where they stop buying ... currency free falls, and we have inflation and you just undid all the stimulative efforts that have taken place over this last year. ...

Millions of people out of work... trillions of dollars in out-of-control Democrat spending (signed into law by Obama)... and now, the real prospect of inflation and higher prices -- possibly much higher -- when Americans can least afford it!

Is this the CHANGE Americans wanted and Obama promised?

AAR

Friday, March 13, 2009

Democrats Started The Economic Crisis...

From The American Thinker: Here's What's Happening to the Economy, By Randall Hoven, March 12, 2009.

[The beginning of] the avalanche, the housing crisis, can be laid at the feet of Democrats almost entirely...

"Andrew Cuomo, the youngest Housing and Urban Development secretary in history, made a series of decisions between 1997 and 2001 that gave birth to the country's current crisis. ...helped plunge Fannie and Freddie into the subprime markets without putting in place the means to monitor their increasingly risky investments. He turned the Federal Housing Administration mortgage program into a sweetheart lender with sky-high loan ceilings and no money down, and he legalized what a federal judge has branded "kickbacks" to brokers that have fueled the sale of overpriced and unsupportable loans. Three to four million families are now facing foreclosure, and Cuomo is one of the reasons why."

Republicans tried to stop this... New York Times word if you prefer.

"The Bush administration is rightly pushing for the Treasury Department to regulate the two giants, along with the network of federal home loan banks. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae provide financing to lenders by creating a secondary market for mortgages... Their current regulator is ill equipped to keep tabs on Freddie's and Fannie's sophisticated hedging strategies and the other financial moves they use to manage their huge investments."

But Democrats manned and womanned the barricades and stopped such regulation attempts. Here was Barney Frank in 2003:

"These two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing."

We've been spending about a trillion dollars a month since this started happening. What do we have for it? Lehman Brothers is still broke. AIG, who received over $150B from the government already, is also broke. Everybody and everything is broke. Nothing is fixed. And no one seems to be fixing anything.
Since Obama was elected president, the markets have tanked another 30% or so, much of which is due to investor's fears over Obama's socialist agenda.

Is this the change YOU wanted? No!

Is this the change for which YOU voted? No!

AAR

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Obamacrats Gun Control: New Ways To Take Your Guns

From Pajamas Media... February 25, 2009 - by Bob Owens

Second Amendment Under Fire: ...in the Obama Era

An Illinois state representative by the name of Kenneth Dunkin is introducing an even more draconian proposal than Obama’s policies, attempting to make it all but impossible for Illinois citizens to own firearms. ...an insidious scheme which would force citizens to carry at least $1 million in insurance to own a gun. The plan is being all but ignored in the media...

...Congressman Bobby Rush has introduced H.R.45, the Blair Holt’s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009, into the U.S. Congress. This legislation would subject the rest of the nation to a massive gun registration and owner licensing and tracking scheme. It would not only require all handgun owners in the United States to register their sidearms with the federal government, but also ...the most common handguns, shotguns, and rifles.

The bill ... imposes an onerous licensing procedure that would require gun owners to submit to intensive background checks and pay as-yet-undetermined renewal fees every five years.

...essentially making it impossible to defend one’s home by making it illegal to store a gun where it can be readily accessed. ...allow the federal government to revoke your permit if you move and fail to provide a change of address within 60 days. ...create a federal database of all gun owners and the firearms they own, making it ripe for abuse or confiscation.
Besides making it too expensive for the average person to own a gun, who will benefit most from requiring a million dollar insurance policy? Why the lawyers, of course, who will sue any and everyone they possibly can, driving up the cost of insurance even further, and guaranteeing that the average gun owner can't afford it!

Anyone who doubts that Obama and his Left-Wing Liberal Socialists aren't set on taking your guns had better pull their head out into the light and wake up!

Stand up for America... Join the National Rifle Association.

They are the BEST INSURANCE for YOUR rights!


AAR

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Obama Administration Calls America 'Nation of Cowards' on Race Matters

Yes, America is a "nation of cowards" for tolerating statements like this from the Obama administration!

Yes, America is a "nation of cowards" for allowing Democrats to continually twist every issue they can into one of racism in their efforts to keep Blacks and minorities blindly voting for Democrats!

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

WASHINGTON -- Eric Holder, the nation's first black attorney general, said Wednesday the United States was "a nation of cowards" on matters of race, with most Americans avoiding candid discussions of racial issues.

In a speech to Justice Department employees marking Black History Month, Holder said the workplace is largely integrated but Americans still self-segregate on the weekends and in their private lives.

"Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and I believe continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards," Holder said.

Race issues continue to be a topic of political discussion, but "we, as average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about race."

Holder cited one of Obama's campaign speechs last year as part of the "motivation" for his words!!!

When will the Democrats once again twist the issues into racism and "play the race card"?

Watch the news. History tell us it won't be long!

The Obama Magic Act...

Obama now needs even more help to fool and manipulate the American people!

As reported in The American Spectator, Obama's handlers want to install an inconspicuous teleprompter or computer screen in his podium so his staff of "media managers" and propagandists can surreptitiously feed him information on what to say and who to call on during news conferences.

"...some inside the White House don't think that President Barack Obama hit a home run with his first national press conference... It looked scripted beyond the scripted part ... this one was pretty ham-handed."

...the White House is looking to install a small video or computer screen into the podium ... [to] make it easier for the comms guys to pass along information without being obvious about it" ... The screen would indicate whom to call on, seat placement for journalists, pass along notes or points to hit, and so forth ...

Using a screen is nothing new for Obama; almost nothing he said in supposedly unscripted townhall events during the presidential campaign was unscripted, down to many of the questions and the answers to those questions. ... not only his opening remarks, but also statistics and information he could use to answer questions.

Obama had a teleprompter set up for his remarks last week ...but the White House couldn't use the teleprompter for anything but the remarks, because the journalists were so close to the screens. ...
The screen must be small and out of public view so the American people (and the world) can't actually see how they are being manipulated by Obama as he reads from a carefully crafted and prepared speech, and how his "knowledge of the subject" is actually being fed to him by a staff of researchers.

We've already seen that Obama isn't too smart when he's speaking from his own knowledge and not reading from script. He continually sticks his foot in his mouth making dumb (but otherwise truthful) statements like "redistributing the wealth", or claiming to have visited "57 states" (with one more to go).

It's not that Obama is "being taken out of context", it's that when he's not following his pre-written prepared speech, he frequently slips and tells the truth... allowing the American people to see what he really means, and what he really intends to do to them and America.

Obama, don't continue to mislead and try to hide your obvious lack of knowledge. When you don't know the subject or the answers, fill in the time with some jokes; check with someone who actually does know the subject; and get back later with an answer!

Obama's news conferences can now be called the Obama Magic Act... just like a slight-of-hand magician, or a fake and deceptive "mind reader" performing before an audience, and being fed information through a concealed earpiece!

AAR

You cannot legislate the poor into wealth...

Something Obama and his left-wing liberal supporters haven't learned...

You can't legislate the poor into wealth and prosperity by legislating the wealthy into poverty!

The late Dr. Adrian Rogers (1931 -- 2005) of Memphis, TN, offered the following observation several years ago, and it bears great significance today:

"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the rich out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that, my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."

Liberals and Liberalism: Creating equality by...

Weakening the strong rather than strengthening the weak!

Taking from those who earned their wealth and redistributing it
to those who didn't work to earn it!

Weakening the United States rather than strengthening others!

Friday, February 20, 2009

Pray Obama Fails

Quoted from...

http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=86469

By Joseph Farah

Originally Posted: January 19, 2009

Many American Christians believe, as an article of faith, that we are to pray for the success of our leaders.

...nowhere does the Bible ever suggest evil rulers are to be obeyed. When the rule of men conflicts with the commands of God, the Bible leaves no doubt about where we should stand. ... It would be folly to pray for his success in such an evil campaign.

So you will not see me joining in the ritual of affirming Obama and his mission in public or private prayer this week – or any other week.

Instead, I uphold the words of Jesus in Matthew 15:14: "Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch." And I take warning from Isaiah 9:16: "For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed."

If government commands you to do evil, as a Christian you must resist. There is no alternative. Citing the "render unto Caesar" line is an apologetic for accountability to God – nothing more, nothing less.

...

Nowhere in the Bible does it teach us to obey evil rulers. ...

This is a time for principled biblical resistance, not phony Christian appeasement.


Joseph Farah is founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate. His book "Taking America Back: A Radical Plan to Revive Freedom, Morality and Justice" has gained newfound popularity in the wake of November's election. Farah also edits the online intelligence newsletter Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, in which he utilizes his sources developed over 30 years in the news business.


Thursday, November 6, 2008

Obama Lemonade

Paraphrasing Forrest Gump...

Life is like a basket of fruit. Sometimes you're handed a lemon.
Now it's time to make lemonade!

AAR

Friday, October 31, 2008

Obamanomics... Wealth Redistribution A First Grader Can Understand!

What does Obama mean when he says big government must tax and redistribute "your" wealth! Ask your child...


Tell your child they must study, work hard in school, get good grades, and excel -- skipping play and television until they have completed all their homework, and done it well.

Then tell your child that, even though they did a great job and fully deserve A's on their homework, the teacher must give them C's instead because there are other "deserving" students who played and watched television, who did not study, and who must be given part of other children's grades so they too can pass.

Tell your child they must share and "redistribute their wealth" -- their hard work, studying, and good grades -- to other children who did not study or do their homework, because that's the caring and "fair" thing to do.

It won't take long for your child to figure out that they aren't being rewarded for their hard work. It won't take them long to figure out that they too can loaf, play, and watch television, get by with mediocre performance, and depend on other students to do the work for them, and share their grades!

That's Obamanomics... even a first grader can understand!


Tell your child they must work and earn their allowance. Tell them there will be no playing or watching television until they have completed their chores and done them well... and if they don't do their chores, they will not get an allowance.

Then, when it's time to give your child their allowance for their hard work, tell them they can not have the full amount. Tell them that you must take part of what they earned and give it to the child next door who played, watched television, and did not do their chores. Tell them that's the caring, human, and "fair" thing to do.

Ask if your child understands why that is the "fair" and right thing to do with the money they worked so hard and diligently to earn.

It won't take long for your child to figure out that there's no need for them to work and do their chores. They too can sit and watch television and wait for their "share" of other children's wealth -- their hard work and allowances -- to be "redistributed down to them".

That's Obamanomics... even a first grader can understand!

(Pass it on.)

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Obama: Pork, Pigs, and Lipstick...

Was it sexism, inexperience, or just poor judgment on the part of Obama?

Was Obama referring to Sarah Palin when he said: “You can put lipstick on a pig, it’s still a pig.”

According to news reports, Obama's audience clearly believed his comment was directed at Sarah Palin:

" ...Many in the Obama crowd leaped to their feet in delight - apparently taking the 'pig' comment as a direct slam at Palin." (New York Post)

" ...The audience, which had a particularly strong reaction whenever Obama mentioned Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, appeared to enjoy the 'lipstick' comment the most." (Reuters)

" ...Many in the audience in Lebanon laughed uproariously when Mr Obama made his lipstick remark, clearly taking it to be a reference to the first female Republican on a presidential ticket..." (Telegraph.co.uk)

Obama said nothing to his audience to change their perceptions, obviously happy with their reaction.

Obama now wants to "change" his story, saying he didn't mean what he said, or say what he meant.

Perhaps Obama just failed to comprehend and understand the meaning of his statements.

Perhaps Obama's thoughts were clouded by the vision of "pork and earmarks" dancing through his head... while dreaming of spending your tax dollars on all his pet Liberal projects... thinking of paybacks to all his Liberal supporters... and imposing his Liberal agenda on all Americans!

Uh, uh, um, uh ahhh, uh, um, ah, er... as much as Obama would like to "change" the facts, one thing we do know is that Obama called someone a pig.


Perhaps it's just another case of Obama's POOR JUDGMENT!!!

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

High Oil, Gas, and Energy Prices... Thank The Democrats ! ! !

Angry over those high gas prices? Are skyrocketting gasoline prices taking a real bite out of your wallet?

Blame the Democrats and environmentalists!!! ...Don't blame President Bush.

Democrats (Liberals) and environmentalists are responsible for much of America's dependence on foreign oil, for high gasoline prices, high heating oil prices, high natural gas prices, high energy costs, and for the TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS that have gone and are going to other countries.

TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS in oil related spending and revenue could have and should have gone to American petroleum suppliers, to American businesses, to American workers, to American families, and for American taxes -- taxes that could have gone to America's education system and to increase American's incomes!

Democrats and environmentalists have blocked efforts to drill for more of America's oil and natural gas! Democrats and environmentalists have blocked efforts to build more refineries, to develop coal liquification and gasification, to develop America's oil shale, to expand the use of nuclear power, and more.

Democrats and environmentalists continue to block drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR) which some estimates predict could produce 30 billion barrels of oil. At $75 per barrel, that's 2.25 TRILLION DOLLARS that could and should remain in America. Even more oil and natural gas could be produced from along our coasts and in other areas within the United States.

And what about all the jobs associated with American oil and gas? Some projections estimate ANWR alone could produce as many as 735,000 jobs and multiple billions of dollars in revenue to the state and federal government. A study by the National Defense Council Foundation projects that ANWR could produce 1,000,000 new jobs for Americans in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Where are these jobs going now -- along with those TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS in oil revenue, salaries, taxes, and American dollars? Those jobs are going to Iran, Venezuela, and other nations to support their economies and to fund their military... to Iran to help develop nuclear weapons and missiles to possibly destroy Israeli and American cities.

It takes time to locate, drill, produce, build new refineries, and distribute oil and gasoline. That oil, gas, and gasoline would be available NOW -- IF -- Democrats and environmentalists had not blocked past efforts. Those TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS could have remained in America and held down our balance of payments -- IF -- Democrats and environmentalists had not blocked past efforts.

America must work to produce new, plentiful, cheap, and renewable fuels and energy, but that will take time. In the mean time, we will continue to rely on petroleum -- AMERICAN oil, gasoline, and natural gas. As we work to develop and produce those new energy sources, we must start drilling in ANWR, along our coasts, and other areas for the oil we need now!

As for those caribou that were supposed to be driven to extinction by the Alaska pipeline... just more of the usual liberal scare tactics.

The caribou are thriving! The Central Arctic caribou herd which numbered around 6,000 in 1977 when the Alaska pipeline begun delivering oil has grown to more than 27,000 by 2006!

DEMOCRATS...

Stop blocking access to American's oil and gas!

Stop blocking efforts to reduce the price of oil and gas!

AAR

Monday, October 1, 2007

Teaching Intelligent Design Science

It is appropriate to teach in a science class:

-- The concept of Intelligent Design as performed and validated by humans.

-- That from this time forward, Intelligent Design is now a fact, and will remain a fact for the rest of history.

-- That from this time forward, we can no longer say that all life on earth is solely a product of natural evolution.

-- That thousands, millions, or billions of years from now, a person observing or studying the descendants of those organisms created through Intelligent Design, any new organisms that evolve from them, and any fossilized remains would be indistinguishable from those which would otherwise have occurred through natural evolution alone.

-- That it would be impossible to determine if today's fossilized remains or living plants and animals are products of previous Intelligent Design, natural evolution, or a combination of both!

What part of that isn't appropriate for a science class? And won't stand up in a court? ! ! !

Teach the concept in the science class, and from there, students can read other books, speculate, and decide for themselves if Intelligent Design may have been a factor in the past, and if it might explain some of those "holes" in the Theory of Evolution"!

AAR

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Intelligent Design is a scientific fact!

There are organisms alive today which were not created through natural evolution, but rather by humans -- through "Intelligent Design"!

From the moment in time that humans began manipulating, modifying, and changing DNA, Intelligent Design became an undeniable fact... and it will remain an undeniable fact throughout the rest of history!

The numbers of those organisms -- plant, animals, and combinations -- will continue to increase as humans continue to "meddle" with DNA. Many of those organisms -- created through Intelligent Design -- already exist in the wild today, and their numbers will continue to grow in the future.

Those organisms will evolve both "naturally" and through changes incorporated through subsequent "Intelligent Design"... possibly mixing with their wild relatives... creating new variations and species... and over time, making it impossible to distinguish between those which evolved naturally and those which owe at least a portion of their existence to "Intelligent Design."

Questions that remain to be answered include:

Who else was or may have been involved in the "Intelligent Design" of life on Earth prior to that of humans?

When and how many times did that occur?

What was created through "Intelligent Design", and what was created through subsequent "evolution"?

Who created the first life on Earth?

AAR

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Bill Clinton's Forgotten War

While Democrats (Liberals) are blaming President Bush for Iraq, let's not forget some of what happened because of DEMOCRAT President Bill Clinton's attacks on other countries...

(CNN) -- "As many as 75 people were killed and 25 were injured when NATO missiles hit two convoys of ethnic Albanians leaving western Kosovo on Wednesday, Serb authorities said."

(CNN) -- "The NATO pilot who bombed a rail bridge in southern Serbia was unable to see a passenger train on the bridge until the instant before his missile struck, NATO's top general said Tuesday."

(BBC) -- "Russia and China lodged protests after Nato's raid on a railway bridge hit a passenger train, killing 10 and leaving 16 injured."

(BBC) -- "After days of speculation, Nato leaders said the alliance was responsible for two attacks on Kosovo convoys, both of which might have included refugees fleeing western Kosovo ... Serb media said the attack left 70 dead."

(BBC) -- "Serbian officials reported that Nato killed at least 16 civilians after two missiles hit a residential area in the southern town of Surdulica. The alliance said that it had struck an army barracks - but did not rule out civilian deaths."

(BBC) -- "Nato admitted that one of its missiles hit the Bulgarian capital Sofia after being fired in self-defence against a surface-to-air missile attack in Yugoslavia, 30 miles away."

(BBC) -- "At least 23 people died when a Nato missile aimed at the Luzane bridge north of Pristina hit a passenger bus. News reports on Serb television showed that one part of the vehicle had plunged off the bridge while the rest had burned for more than an hour."

(BBC) -- "Nato admitted that a cluster bomb aimed at an airfield in the Yugoslav city of Nis hit a hospital and a market, killing 15 civilians. Local officials said that a further 60 people were injured in the daylight attack which left unexploded cluster bombs lying in gardens."

(BBC) -- "Serb TV reported at least five dead and at least another 30 injured when the three missiles fell 600m short of their target. The missiles struck apartments, an 'emergency centre' and a medical dispensary, TV reports said."

(BBC) -- "At least 100 civilians died after Nato bombed what it said were 'legitimate military targets' in the village of Korisa, southern Kosovo. Footage broadcast by Serbian TV showed charred remains, including at least two children, smouldering homes and burning tractors."

(BBC) -- "Serb officials say that a Nato bombing attack led to the deaths of at least three patients in a Belgrade hospital.Parts of the Dragisa Misovic hospital, near a barracks in the Dedinje district, were reduced to rubble. State television reported that emergency services evacuated infants and pregnant women."

(BBC) -- "At least 11 civilians were reported killed and a further 40 injured when Nato bombers mounted a daylight raid on a bridge in Varvarin, south-central Serbia."

(BBC) -- "Yugoslavia reported that at least 20 people lost their lives when Nato bombs hit a sanotorium and neighbouring old people's home in Surdulica, south-east Serbia - the second loss of civilian life in the town since bombing began."

(BBC) -- "In the third Nato blunder in 26 hours, alliance missiles hit an apartment block in Novi Pazar, south-west Serbia, killing at least 11 people and injuring a further 23 residents. Tanjug said that 20 missiles fell on various targets in Novi Pazar with the apartment taking a direct hit. More bodies were believed buried in the rubble."

(WSJ) -- "Clinton dropped bombs on Afghanistan and an aspirin factory in Sudan in 1998 in an unsuccessful attempt to deter Osama bin Laden."

And less we for forget...

(BBC) -- "In the biggest mistake of the campaign to date, Washington admitted that an out-of-date map used by its intelligence operations had led Nato to launch missiles at the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, killing three people, injuring a further 20. Nato said that the intended target had been the Yugoslav Federal directorate of Supply and Procurement 200 yards away."

(What in the world was Clinton thinking? Not only does he bomb the Chinese embassy, but the target Clinton was aiming at was only 200 yards from the embassy. What in the world could Clinton have been thinking to target a building only 200 yards for the embassy? No one in their right mind would so somethinga as illogical and stupid as that, right?)

(BBC) -- "In its defence, the alliance has called on the world's media to put its bombing campaign in perspective, arguing that fewer civilians have been killed or injured in the Kosovo campaign than in any other comparable conflict."

Comments from one web site:

"Bosnia has become Jihad-Central, courtesy of Bill Clinton who made it safe for terrorists by his disastrous war on the Serbs. It is hardly ever mentioned that all those mass graves which were the pretext for the illegal bombing of civilian targets in that war were never found."

"The media and democrats did not demand to know where they were -- nor was Bill Clinton accused of lying to get us into that war which was NOT sanctioned by the U.N. Civilian targets were the rule of the day in that war, resulting in every single bridge over the Danube being destroyed, an action which blocked vital shipping lanes for countries which relied on that river to ship most of their goods -- and let's not forget the ecological disaster wreaked by the bombing."

"In addition to the bridges, the bombing targets included a fully loaded civilian train which resulted in hundreds of casualties, and the 'accidental' bombing of the Chinese Embassy due to an 'outdated map'."

"The result has been a safe haven for Muslim terrorists on European soil, and the destruction and burning of hundreds of Christian churches by Muslim mobs while U.N. forces stood idly by and watched."

AAR

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

No Patriotic, Flag Waving, Fourth Of July For Progressives (Liberals)

Let's not forget that many (perhaps most) left-wing Liberals do not share our patriotism, our belief in America's traditional values, our respect for the American flag, and our belief in a strong America.

Far too many Liberals would be happy and excited to see the American flag burned and trashed and America transformed into a third rate nation, subservient to the will, whims, and dictates of the United Nations and other countries.


As Howard Zinn writes in an opinion article on Progressive.org:

    "Put away the flags (link)"

(excerpts):

"On this July 4, we would do well to renounce nationalism and all its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its anthems, its insistence in song that God must single out America to be blessed."

"Is not nationalism -- that devotion to a flag, an anthem, a boundary so fierce it engenders mass murder -- one of the great evils of our time, along with racism, along with religious hatred?"

"These ways of thinking -- cultivated, nurtured, indoctrinated from childhood on -- have been useful to those in power, and deadly for those out of power."

"We need to refute the idea that our nation is different from, morally superior to, the other imperial powers of world history. We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation."

"We need to refute the idea that our nation is different from, morally superior to, the other imperial powers of world history. We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation."


"Blogs For Fred Thompson" also comments on the "Progressive" article:

    "Fly the Flag or Put Away the Flag (link)"


"Progressives" (a.k.a. Liberals and the Democrats who support and enable them) are America's REAL enemies!

Progressives (Liberals) would like nothing more than to weaken and destroy America's traditional beliefs and values, and relegate America to a third rate nation -- socially, morally, militarily, and economically!


I guess we can see and understand why...

...Democrats continue to block efforts to pass a Constitutional Amendment to make burning and desecrating the flag illegal!

...Democrats believe illegal immigrants in America should have the "right" to fly "their" nation's flag above the American flag -- while burning and destroying ours!

...Democrats oppose teaching and encouraging pro-Americanism in our schools!

Perhaps Democrats would support a Constitutional Amendment making it illegal to burn the U.N. flag ! ! ! ! !


WE are AMERICANS FIRST and FOREMOST ! ! !

STAND UP for America... SPEAK OUT for America!

JUST SAY NO to Liberalism... America's Enemy Within ! ! !

AAR

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

Scooter Libby Versus Sandy Berger... Democrat HYPOCRISY at its finest!!!

Talk about cover ups and a complete travesty and utter miscarriage of justice...

Democrats feign outrage over President Bush's decision to commute Scooter Libby's excessive sentence, but show little or no concern for the crimes, actions, and "light" sentence given to Sander Berger?

Scooter Libby was given 30 months in jail and a $250,000 fine for lying (possibly forgetting) and covering up an investigation into a crime for which no one was ever charged, and for which the "leaker" was already known early in the investigation.

Sandy Berger, President Clinton's former National Security Adviser, on the other hand, deliberately steals and destroys some of our nation's most highly classified documents and information in an effort to hide and cover up something which was obviously of great and grave importance to the 9/11 Commission and the American people.

Sandy Berger steals and destroys our nation's secrets, lies to investigators, destroys and thus withholds information from the 9/11 Commission investigating the worst attack on American soil in our nation's history... and for that Berger gets 100 hours of community service, 2-year probation, a $50,000 fine, and pays $6,905 for the administrative costs of his two-year probation!

Where is the justice? Where is the Democrat outrage, and cries for a full investigation from the DEMOCRAT Congress into what Sandy Berger may have destroyed, hidden, and covered up that's far more important to the American people and history than Libby's "crime"!

Don't fall for the outdated story that Berger only had access to "copies." That's not true! Check the articles published after late December 2006 which do not simple rely on or reference older material and facts. Berger had access to ORIGINAL documents and copies that may have contained ORIGINAL NOTES which could have been stolen, hidden, and/or destroyed!

DEMOCRATS control Congress. DEMOCRATS are conducting investigations, inquiries, and hearings on everything imaginable. Why aren't the DEMOCRATS in Congress investigating Sandy Berger and trying to find out just what he REALLY destroyed and WHO he is REALLY trying to protect?

Let's find out what President Clinton did that's warrants the theft and destruction of highly classified documents from America's National Archives and from the scrutiny of historians!

Oh, that's right! Libby is a Republican and Berger is a DEMOCRAT, and it does not serve the DEMOCRATS' AGENDA to investigate one of THEIR OWN!!!

AAR