Teaching Intelligent Design Science

It is appropriate to teach in a science class:

-- The concept of Intelligent Design as performed and validated by humans.

-- That from this time forward, Intelligent Design is now a fact, and will remain a fact for the rest of history.

-- That from this time forward, we can no longer say that all life on earth is solely a product of natural evolution.

-- That thousands, millions, or billions of years from now, a person observing or studying the descendants of those organisms created through Intelligent Design, any new organisms that evolve from them, and any fossilized remains would be indistinguishable from those which would otherwise have occurred through natural evolution alone.

-- That it would be impossible to determine if today's fossilized remains or living plants and animals are products of previous Intelligent Design, natural evolution, or a combination of both!

What part of that isn't appropriate for a science class? And won't stand up in a court? ! ! !

Teach the concept in the science class, and from there, students can read other books, speculate, and decide for themselves if Intelligent Design may have been a factor in the past, and if it might explain some of those "holes" in the Theory of Evolution"!

AAR

Intelligent Design is a scientific fact!

There are organisms alive today which were not created through natural evolution, but rather by humans -- through "Intelligent Design"!

From the moment in time that humans began manipulating, modifying, and changing DNA, Intelligent Design became an undeniable fact... and it will remain an undeniable fact throughout the rest of history!

The numbers of those organisms -- plant, animals, and combinations -- will continue to increase as humans continue to "meddle" with DNA. Many of those organisms -- created through Intelligent Design -- already exist in the wild today, and their numbers will continue to grow in the future.

Those organisms will evolve both "naturally" and through changes incorporated through subsequent "Intelligent Design"... possibly mixing with their wild relatives... creating new variations and species... and over time, making it impossible to distinguish between those which evolved naturally and those which owe at least a portion of their existence to "Intelligent Design."

Questions that remain to be answered include:

Who else was or may have been involved in the "Intelligent Design" of life on Earth prior to that of humans?

When and how many times did that occur?

What was created through "Intelligent Design", and what was created through subsequent "evolution"?

Who created the first life on Earth?

AAR

Bill Clinton's Forgotten War

While Democrats (Liberals) are blaming President Bush for Iraq, let's not forget some of what happened because of DEMOCRAT President Bill Clinton's attacks on other countries...

(CNN) -- "As many as 75 people were killed and 25 were injured when NATO missiles hit two convoys of ethnic Albanians leaving western Kosovo on Wednesday, Serb authorities said."

(CNN) -- "The NATO pilot who bombed a rail bridge in southern Serbia was unable to see a passenger train on the bridge until the instant before his missile struck, NATO's top general said Tuesday."

(BBC) -- "Russia and China lodged protests after Nato's raid on a railway bridge hit a passenger train, killing 10 and leaving 16 injured."

(BBC) -- "After days of speculation, Nato leaders said the alliance was responsible for two attacks on Kosovo convoys, both of which might have included refugees fleeing western Kosovo ... Serb media said the attack left 70 dead."

(BBC) -- "Serbian officials reported that Nato killed at least 16 civilians after two missiles hit a residential area in the southern town of Surdulica. The alliance said that it had struck an army barracks - but did not rule out civilian deaths."

(BBC) -- "Nato admitted that one of its missiles hit the Bulgarian capital Sofia after being fired in self-defence against a surface-to-air missile attack in Yugoslavia, 30 miles away."

(BBC) -- "At least 23 people died when a Nato missile aimed at the Luzane bridge north of Pristina hit a passenger bus. News reports on Serb television showed that one part of the vehicle had plunged off the bridge while the rest had burned for more than an hour."

(BBC) -- "Nato admitted that a cluster bomb aimed at an airfield in the Yugoslav city of Nis hit a hospital and a market, killing 15 civilians. Local officials said that a further 60 people were injured in the daylight attack which left unexploded cluster bombs lying in gardens."

(BBC) -- "Serb TV reported at least five dead and at least another 30 injured when the three missiles fell 600m short of their target. The missiles struck apartments, an 'emergency centre' and a medical dispensary, TV reports said."

(BBC) -- "At least 100 civilians died after Nato bombed what it said were 'legitimate military targets' in the village of Korisa, southern Kosovo. Footage broadcast by Serbian TV showed charred remains, including at least two children, smouldering homes and burning tractors."

(BBC) -- "Serb officials say that a Nato bombing attack led to the deaths of at least three patients in a Belgrade hospital.Parts of the Dragisa Misovic hospital, near a barracks in the Dedinje district, were reduced to rubble. State television reported that emergency services evacuated infants and pregnant women."

(BBC) -- "At least 11 civilians were reported killed and a further 40 injured when Nato bombers mounted a daylight raid on a bridge in Varvarin, south-central Serbia."

(BBC) -- "Yugoslavia reported that at least 20 people lost their lives when Nato bombs hit a sanotorium and neighbouring old people's home in Surdulica, south-east Serbia - the second loss of civilian life in the town since bombing began."

(BBC) -- "In the third Nato blunder in 26 hours, alliance missiles hit an apartment block in Novi Pazar, south-west Serbia, killing at least 11 people and injuring a further 23 residents. Tanjug said that 20 missiles fell on various targets in Novi Pazar with the apartment taking a direct hit. More bodies were believed buried in the rubble."

(WSJ) -- "Clinton dropped bombs on Afghanistan and an aspirin factory in Sudan in 1998 in an unsuccessful attempt to deter Osama bin Laden."

And less we for forget...

(BBC) -- "In the biggest mistake of the campaign to date, Washington admitted that an out-of-date map used by its intelligence operations had led Nato to launch missiles at the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, killing three people, injuring a further 20. Nato said that the intended target had been the Yugoslav Federal directorate of Supply and Procurement 200 yards away."

(What in the world was Clinton thinking? Not only does he bomb the Chinese embassy, but the target Clinton was aiming at was only 200 yards from the embassy. What in the world could Clinton have been thinking to target a building only 200 yards for the embassy? No one in their right mind would so somethinga as illogical and stupid as that, right?)

(BBC) -- "In its defence, the alliance has called on the world's media to put its bombing campaign in perspective, arguing that fewer civilians have been killed or injured in the Kosovo campaign than in any other comparable conflict."

Comments from one web site:

"Bosnia has become Jihad-Central, courtesy of Bill Clinton who made it safe for terrorists by his disastrous war on the Serbs. It is hardly ever mentioned that all those mass graves which were the pretext for the illegal bombing of civilian targets in that war were never found."

"The media and democrats did not demand to know where they were -- nor was Bill Clinton accused of lying to get us into that war which was NOT sanctioned by the U.N. Civilian targets were the rule of the day in that war, resulting in every single bridge over the Danube being destroyed, an action which blocked vital shipping lanes for countries which relied on that river to ship most of their goods -- and let's not forget the ecological disaster wreaked by the bombing."

"In addition to the bridges, the bombing targets included a fully loaded civilian train which resulted in hundreds of casualties, and the 'accidental' bombing of the Chinese Embassy due to an 'outdated map'."

"The result has been a safe haven for Muslim terrorists on European soil, and the destruction and burning of hundreds of Christian churches by Muslim mobs while U.N. forces stood idly by and watched."

AAR

No Patriotic, Flag Waving, Fourth Of July For Progressives (Liberals)

Let's not forget that many (perhaps most) left-wing Liberals do not share our patriotism, our belief in America's traditional values, our respect for the American flag, and our belief in a strong America.

Far too many Liberals would be happy and excited to see the American flag burned and trashed and America transformed into a third rate nation, subservient to the will, whims, and dictates of the United Nations and other countries.


As Howard Zinn writes in an opinion article on Progressive.org:

    "Put away the flags (link)"

(excerpts):

"On this July 4, we would do well to renounce nationalism and all its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance, its anthems, its insistence in song that God must single out America to be blessed."

"Is not nationalism -- that devotion to a flag, an anthem, a boundary so fierce it engenders mass murder -- one of the great evils of our time, along with racism, along with religious hatred?"

"These ways of thinking -- cultivated, nurtured, indoctrinated from childhood on -- have been useful to those in power, and deadly for those out of power."

"We need to refute the idea that our nation is different from, morally superior to, the other imperial powers of world history. We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation."

"We need to refute the idea that our nation is different from, morally superior to, the other imperial powers of world history. We need to assert our allegiance to the human race, and not to any one nation."

"Blogs For Fred Thompson" also comments on the "Progressive" article:

    "Fly the Flag or Put Away the Flag (link)"


"Progressives" (a.k.a. Liberals and the Democrats who support and enable them) are America's REAL enemies!

Progressives (Liberals) would like nothing more than to weaken and destroy America's traditional beliefs and values, and relegate America to a third rate nation -- socially, morally, militarily, and economically!


I guess we can see and understand why...

...Democrats continue to block efforts to pass a Constitutional Amendment to make burning and desecrating the flag illegal!

...Democrats believe illegal immigrants in America should have the "right" to fly "their" nation's flag above the American flag -- while burning and destroying ours!

...Democrats oppose teaching and encouraging pro-Americanism in our schools!

Perhaps Democrats would support a Constitutional Amendment making it illegal to burn the U.N. flag ! ! ! ! !


WE are AMERICANS FIRST and FOREMOST ! ! !

STAND UP for America... SPEAK OUT for America!

JUST SAY NO to Liberalism... America's Enemy Within ! ! !

AAR

Scooter Libby Versus Sandy Berger... Democrat HYPOCRISY at its finest!!!

Talk about cover ups and a complete travesty and utter miscarriage of justice...

Democrats feign outrage over President Bush's decision to commute Scooter Libby's excessive sentence, but show little or no concern for the crimes, actions, and "light" sentence given to Sander Berger?

Scooter Libby was given 30 months in jail and a $250,000 fine for lying (possibly forgetting) and covering up an investigation into a crime for which no one was ever charged, and for which the "leaker" was already known early in the investigation.

Sandy Berger, President Clinton's former National Security Adviser, on the other hand, deliberately steals and destroys some of our nation's most highly classified documents and information in an effort to hide and cover up something which was obviously of great and grave importance to the 9/11 Commission and the American people.

Sandy Berger steals and destroys our nation's secrets, lies to investigators, destroys and thus withholds information from the 9/11 Commission investigating the worst attack on American soil in our nation's history... and for that Berger gets 100 hours of community service, 2-year probation, a $50,000 fine, and pays $6,905 for the administrative costs of his two-year probation!

Where is the justice? Where is the Democrat outrage, and cries for a full investigation from the DEMOCRAT Congress into what Sandy Berger may have destroyed, hidden, and covered up that's far more important to the American people and history than Libby's "crime"!

Don't fall for the outdated story that Berger only had access to "copies." That's not true! Check the articles published after late December 2006 which do not simple rely on or reference older material and facts. Berger had access to ORIGINAL documents and copies that may have contained ORIGINAL NOTES which could have been stolen, hidden, and/or destroyed!

DEMOCRATS control Congress. DEMOCRATS are conducting investigations, inquiries, and hearings on everything imaginable. Why aren't the DEMOCRATS in Congress investigating Sandy Berger and trying to find out just what he REALLY destroyed and WHO he is REALLY trying to protect?

Let's find out what President Clinton did that's warrants the theft and destruction of highly classified documents from America's National Archives and from the scrutiny of historians!

Oh, that's right! Libby is a Republican and Berger is a DEMOCRAT, and it does not serve the DEMOCRATS' AGENDA to investigate one of THEIR OWN!!!

AAR

Democrat Efforts To Undermine The Surge Are Working!

As I said in a prior post...

The Democrats (Liberals) have, in effect, told the terrorists that if they will kill more American troops, kill more Iraqi families, increase their terrorism -- and just hang in there a little longer -- their efforts and violence will provide the headlines and body counts needed to assure Democrats the support and votes to cut the funding for our troops and force America's defeat, retreat, surrender, and failure!!!

Predictably, terrorists have ramped up their violence, and our soldiers are paying the price.

The Associated Press (AP), Jun 29 2007, reported...

"BAGHDAD (AP) - A huge bomb explosion followed by a hail of gunfire and grenades killed five U.S. soldiers, the military said Friday. The attack came as the Pentagon tallied up the deadliest three-month period for Americans since the war began."

"Those deaths brought to 99 the number of U.S. troops killed this month, according to an Associated Press count. The toll for the past three months-329-made it the deadliest quarter for U.S. troops in Iraq since the March 2003 invasion. That surpasses the 316 soldiers killed during November 2004 to January 2005...."

It must be truly disheartening for our troops -- risking and giving their lives to stabilize Iraq and defeat our enemies -- while Democrats (Liberals) knowingly or unknowingly -- through their words, actions, and deeds -- continue to provide aid, hope, and encouragement to the terrorists... just as they have done throughout the war!

Why should terrorists give up? Why should terrorists stop their violence and killing?

Terrorists know all too well that the greater the violence and the more they kill our troops and Iraqi families, the louder Democrats (Liberals) will cry out for America's defeat, retreat, and surrender!

The Taliban, too, will increase their violence, terrorism, and suicide bombings -- killing more American soldiers and Afghanistani families -- as they work to provide the headlines Democrats will need (and use!) to defeat America in Afghanistan as well!

How can America ever hope to defeat terrorism while Democrats (Liberals) are working so hard to defeat America?

Terrorists can't defeat America's military. Terrorists are counting on the Democrats to do that for them!

DEMOCRATS... REWARDING terrorists for their BAD BEHAVIOR ! ! !

AAR

Amnesty Program Will Not Stop Illegal Immigration

Any form of amnesty program will ultimately cost American taxpayers hundreds of billions, more likely trillions, of dollars.

American citizens wait in line for treatment while illegal immigrants get health care ahead of them. And if the illegal immigrants can just make it to America and have their child in an American hospital at the American taxpayer's expense, they are locked in. That child is a U.S. citizen and their parents will likely never be deported -- illegal immigrants or not!

If those millions of illegal immigrants are given "guest worker" status, they will most likely qualify for welfare at the American taxpayer's expense. They will bring their families too, which will require even more welfare. And, if they are here legally, it is even more likely they will have even more children who automatically become U.S. citizens which will guarantee that the parents never have to leave American, even if their "guest worker" status requires it!

In addition to welfare, the American taxpayer will have to pay to build more schools for the children of the "guest workers". The American taxpayer will have to pay for the bureaucracy to support the "guest worker" program. The American taxpayer will have to pay for their interpreters and legal costs. The list goes on, and on, and on, and ...

Once their status becomes legal, will they continue to work those low paid jobs that American won't do? Not likely. There will be attempts to unionize them, to increase their pay, to force employers to provide them with health insurance, etc. If they are willing to march by the hundreds of thousands for their "rights" while illegal workers, just think of the marches we can expect if they are here legally. They will have "rights" and will demand even more!

Will illegal immigration stop if we grant "guest worker" status to those millions of workers who are already here illegally? No! If the illegal workers don't recognize our laws now, are those who don't qualify as "guest workers" going to stop crossing our borders? No!

Granting "guest worker" status to the millions of illegal workers will not solve the problem... but, it will assure that we have even more millions of low paid immigrants here being subsidized by the American taxpayer!

The Heritage Foundation's Robert Rector calculates that during their lifetimes, they will likely receive "$2.5 TRILLION more in government services than they will pay in taxes." Among those benefits are Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income, public housing, subsidized college education and Social Security Disability Insurance.

Look at what uncontrolled immigration has done to France and Europe. America doesn't need to create those problems here!

AAR

Democrats Undermine The Surge And Our Troops

The Democrats have undermined the "surge" and America's soldiers in Iraq, just as they have undermined our troops throughout the war!

The DUMB Democrats have told the terrorists that if the "surge" doesn't work, Democrats will do all they can to cut the funding, pull the troops, defeat America, and leave Iraq to the terrorists!

The DUMB Democrats have, in effect, told the terrorists that the best way they can help Democrats convince Americans the surge isn't working -- and the war against terrorism is lost -- is to ramp up the violence, bombings, killing, kidnapping, and terrorism -- and most of all -- kill more American soldiers!

The DUMB Democrats have, in effect, told the terrorists that if they will kill more American troops, kill more Iraqi families, increase their terrorism -- and just hang in there a few more months -- their efforts will assure that Democrats have the support and votes they need to cut the funding and force America's defeat, retreat, surrender, and failure!!!

Democrats need those daily reports of violence, terrorism, bombings, and American deaths to make the American people falsely believe they must accept defeat at the hands of the terrorists. Terrorists know that, and they are anxious and willing to provide the violence and deaths Democrats want and need for those daily news and media headlines.

May 2007 was among the deadliest months for our soldiers in Iraq! Why?

...Because the terrorists are doing what the DUMB Democrats, in effect, told them to do!

This summer too will be among the deadliest for our troops, their families, and Iraqi families! Why?

...Because the terrorists are doing what DUMB Democrats, in effect, told the terrorists to do! Ramp up the violence and kill more American soldiers!!!

The Taliban have also seen how Democrats use the reports of violence and deaths of American soldiers to undermine and destroy America's will to win.

Having seen this, the Taliban will be increasing their violence and terrorism, increasing their suicide bombings, killing more American soldiers, and killing more Afghanistani families to provide the headlines Democrats need to defeat America in Afghanistan as well!

Terrorists can't defeat America's military. Terrorists are counting on the Democrats to do that for them!

DUMB Democrats... REWARDING terrorists for their BAD BEHAVIOR ! ! !

AAR

No Constitutional Right Or Protection For Gay Marriage

Don't be mislead by Democrat (Liberals).

There is no Constitutional right or protection for gay marriage. Once again, activist LAW-GIVER Liberal judges are UNCONSTITUTIONALLY changing the meaning and intend of the Constitution to suit their own personal views and beliefs!

LAW-GIVER judges have UNCONSTITUTIONALLY usurped (illegally taken) the powers assigned to Congress and are "de facto" Amending the Constitution by their rulings and decisions -- contrary to the AMENDMENT PROCESS clearly STATED in the Constitution itself!

As long as the American people permit LAW-GIVER judges to change the meaning and intent of the Constitution, WE HAVE NO CONSTITUTION!

The American people must STOP these activist Liberal LAW-GIVER judges and RESTORE the CONSTITUTION!


A little history...

Sodomy [without which there would be no gay marriage] has, until recently, been viewed and treated as a major crime. When this nation was formed, sodomy carried harsh penalties, including extended jail terms, life in prison, and even the death penalty! (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1786, Pennsylvania became the first of the 13 American states to drop the death penalty for sodomy. The new sentence was 10 years in prison and the forfeiture of all property. (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1788, at the time the U.S. Constitution was ratified, sodomy was a major crime in all states, with punishment ranging from extended jail sentences up to and including the death penalty in at least nine of the states! (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1791, at the time the Bill of Rights, the first Ten Amendments, to the Constitution was ratified, sodomy was a major crime in all states, with punishment ranging from extended jail sentences up to and including the death penalty! Nine of the original thirteen states still provided the death penalty for sodomy. (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1868, at the time the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, all but 5 of the 37 States in the Union had criminal sodomy laws up to and including life in prison and the death penalty. Four states still specified the death penalty for sodomy and eleven states provided a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1986 the Supreme Court heard the case of Bowers v. Hardwick. The Supreme Court upheld Georgia's sodomy laws. The Justices ruled that the practice of "homosexual sodomy" was not a "fundamental right." The majority opinion, written by Byron White, pointed out that "sodomy was a criminal offense at common law and was forbidden by the laws of the original 13 States when they ratified the Bill of Rights." It went on to observe that "in 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, all but 5 of the 37 States in the Union had criminal sodomy laws. In fact, until 1961, all 50 States outlawed sodomy." (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 2003, only 13 years later, however, in the case of Lawrence v. Texas, the activist Liberal majority on the Supreme Court struck down the Texas sodomy law, reversing the 1986 decision in which the high court had correctly upheld the Georgia statute -- not finding a constitutional protection of sexual privacy.

In the 2003 case, the activist Liberal majority on the Supreme Courts reversed history, reversed our nation's laws, and illegally and unconstitutionally proclaimed that the framers of the 14th Amendment's "due process clause" intended it to protect "liberty of the person both in its spatial and more transcendent dimensions." clearly contrary to the history of the laws of the United States, and ALL rulings prior to it! (Judicial Activism at its finest.)

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who had voted with the majority in Bowers, agreed with the final outcome of the case, but did not join the court in reversing the high court's 1986 decision in the similar Georgia case Bowers v. Hardwick. Justice O'Connor said that she would not overrule Bowers. Instead, she would invalidate the Texas law because it applied only to same-sex couples. For her, the Georgia law in Bowers was different because it applied both to opposite-sex and same-sex couples.

Justice Scalia, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thomas, dissented. He said that the Court was not justified in overruling the precedent of Bowers v. Hardwick. Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion argued that states should be able to make the moral judgment that homosexual conduct is wrong and embody that judgment in criminal statutes.

The 2003 ruling was an unconstitutional ruling by activist Liberal judges, and clearly contrary to the history of the laws of the United States, and ALL rulings prior to it. In effect, the judges AMENDED [de facto] the U.S. CONSTITUTION in a manner contrary to that prescribed and permitted by the U.S. CONSTITUTION itself! The high court should have upheld the Texas law and left the decision to the states where it belonged.

But, guess what, when we permit judges to make our laws and amend the Constitution, it permits future judges to do the same thing! Since Liberals choose to ignore and abort the Constitution, who knows how a court might rule on this matter some time in the future.

By permitting activist judges to use the concept of a "living" Constitution to amend the Constitution, we in effect, have NO Constitutional GUARANTEES, RIGHTS, and PROTECTIONS!

The Constitution means only what a group of judges declares that it means at the time of their latest ruling!

Judicial activism is destroying our Constitution and our nation!

A "living" Constitution is a DEAD Constitution!

AAR

Intelligent Design And Evolution

Intelligent Design is now an undeniable fact!

Humans have modified, changed, and "designed" life through genetic engineering and DNA manipulation.

Scientists can no longer claim that all life on earth evolved solely through random chance, spontaneous mutation, and natural selection.

The organisms created and modified by humans will mix with and become part of the "natural" DNA pool. That DNA will be incorporated in and perpetuated by the natural evolutionary process from this time forward.

Years from now, it will be difficult or impossible to determine which DNA components originated with or were modified by humans, and which originated solely through random chance, spontaneous mutation, and natural selection...

...Just as we cannot tell today which DNA may have been incorporated in the past by other Intelligent Designers or God!!!

Now, we are just trying to determine who else was involved the Intelligent Design of life -- in its creation, its development, and its "evolution"!!!

AAR

Pollution Is The Solution... to Global Warming!

Perhaps we need MORE POLLUTION to counter the "alleged" greenhouse effect from carbon dioxide, or at least that's what some scientists are now proposing... and as any good Democrat (Liberal) can attest, if a scientist says it, it must be so... it must be good!

"... prominent scientists, including a Nobel Prize winner, have come up with a controversial proposal during the UN conference on climate change. They raise the idea of creating a 'shade' of pollution to cool the earth. It's like creating an umbrella of black smoke to prevent the sun's heat from reaching the earth. It has to be reintroduced regularly, as the pollutants fall back into the Earth through rain and other means. It is a temporary relief while experts are looking for more permanent ways of dealing with the problem."

You can find other stories on the "pollution proposal" using Google. I've also included a few more links on the subject in one of my earlier posts, "Pollution May Control Global Warming" (clickable link below).

http://aaropinionsmore.blogspot.com/2006/11/perhaps-we-need-more-pollution-to.html

People really do need to read and be told about the solar cycles, historical climate change, historical periods of warming and cooling, and understand that THE SUN itself has a great deal to say about how hot or cold the Earth and it's climate are at any point in time! Democrats (Liberals) don't want that message discussed, however, because that would keep their message of fear and hysteria from having its (their) desired effect! Perhaps "greenhouse gases" are "contributing" to the increase in global temperatures, but just how much?

If sea levels are rising, Democrats (Liberals) will quickly blame and chastise a person who pours a bucket of water in the ocean and accuse them of contributing to the rise in sea level. True, that bucket of water may have "contributed" to the rise in sea levels, but the effect of that bucket of water and it's infinitesimal impact on the total picture is lost in rounding, and in that case, would be ZERO!

And if the Earth is warming, is that all bad? Perhaps the net effect will be positive! Yes, maybe New Orleans had better consider building and re-building above sea level, but perhaps much of the rest of the world will benefit and more plants will flourish!

I'm not saying that we don't need to look at and work toward reducing our use of fossil fuels -- from an economical standpoint if nothing else -- but it needs to be done in a rational manner, over time, and considering factors such as the economic impact. Democrats don't want that approach. Democrats want to create panic as a means of getting it done THEIR WAY!

And what are we going to do when the sun "decides" it's time for a period of global cooling -- another ice age? Rush to burn more fossil fuels and produce more greenhouse gases? Perhaps that cloud of soot and carbon IS THE ANSWER -- to both problems. Since the particles settle out over time, we can add more particles when we need shade to cool the Earth and let them settle out when we need less shade and a warmer climate...

...Whatever DEMOCRATS (LIBERALS) -- in their infinite and all knowing wisdom -- decide and mandate is BEST for the rest of us!!!

AAR

Pelosi -- Da Plane, Da Plane... Give Me Da Plane!

Democrats want to justify Nancy Pelosi's request for her own commerical sized jet by saying Republican Hastert used a military plane to fly back and forth to his home state when he was the House Speaker.

Yes... but there are some "minor" differences between the commuter sized plane used by Hastert and the large commerical sized jet to which Democrat Pelosi believes she is entitled, capable of carrying almost 200 people and at an estimated cost to the taxpayers of $15 million per year!

From CBS news (AP) ...

"After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the Pentagon agreed to provide the House speaker, who is second in the line of presidential succession behind the vice president, with a military plane for added security during trips home. Hastert flew in a commuter-size Air Force jet." (Emphasis mine.)

From the Boston Globe (AP)...

"A waste of the taxpayers' money, some said, claiming her trips would cost 15 million a year if she used planes such as the military version of the Boeing 757-200. In its commercial configuration the 757-200 usually seats 175-190 passengers." (Emphasis mine.)

"Pelosi should lead by example, argued others, because a bigger plane consumes more fuel and contributes more to the global warming she expresses concern about."

"'The jet that Pelosi has produces 10,000 pounds of carbon dioxide an hour, far more than the previous speaker used,' said Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C. Pelosi's predecessor was Rep. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill."

"'By commandeering a huge government plane for her personal transport to California, this is totally contradictory to the alarm bells we heard her ringing in the Science Committee just a few hours ago,' Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., said."

And yes, I know... but, but, but, Queen Pelosi must fly in "da plane" all the way to California ...as do millions of other Americans, Nancy!

AAR

Pelosi's Silly Request For Her Own Government Plane

Democrats -- in their efforts at damage control -- called Republicans "silly" for opposing Nancy Pelosi's request that the Pentagon provide her with a commercial sized jet to cruise back and forth from California!

Rather than support the Republican in their efforts to expose the Democrats as they should have, the White House, speaking through Tony Snow, chose instead to undermine the Republicans by agreeing that it was "silly" to question Pelosi's request for her own commercial sized private jet at an estimated cost to the taxpayers of $15 million per year!

Silly? Not in the least! A blunder on the part of the White House and Tony Snow? Absolutely! Yet another media opportunity blown, trashed, and thrown down the drain by the White House!

Hasn't the President learned anything about dealing with Democrats and the liberal media over the past six years? Let the Democrats stew in and defend their own media problems -- especially ones they create. If "Queen" Pelosi believes she is entitled to her own private Air Force 3 -- right behind President Bush in Air Force 1 and the Vice President in Air Force 2 -- then let her defend that requirement to the American people! We absolutely DO NOT NEED the White House undermining the efforts of those Republicans who are working to point out Nancy's excessive demands to the American voters!

I don't have a problem with Pelosi flying on a military plane, but it's NOT AIR FORCE 3 as Nancy might like! She's not entitled to one that can hold all of her Democratic backers and supporters either or those whom she may want to impress with a flight on HER plane. A hop on a military jet? Yes. A modest plane? Perhaps. One that may need to refuel once -- at a secure military base? Yes. But NOT AIR FORCE 3!!!

If the White House wanted to say something about the issue, then just tell the press that the White House supports her flying on an available military aircraft, but that the details and size must be worked out with the Pentagon. But absolutely DO NOT call the Republican's efforts to publicize her request SILLY! That's a blunder a novice like myself might make, but one that should NOT be made by the White House or a seasoned pro like Snow! All Snow did by calling it SILLY was to provide a one word propaganda windfall to the Democrats and the liberal media, undermining the efforts of Republicans.

Perhaps next time the White House should just keep quiet... like they have done for the past six years while Democrats effectively out maneuvered them with their lies and propaganda!

AAR

More Money Is NOT THE ANSWER To Better Schools

The Utah House approved a private school tuition voucher program — by a single vote (link). "Parents for Choice in Education spokeswoman Nancy Pomeroy called 38-37 vote on HB148 a big win for Utah families."

This is a step... a start... but only a very small one in what remains a very big problem and task!

School choice and school vouchers should be -- MUST BE -- one of the items at the top of our priority list, and it should remain their until fully implemented around the nation. The message must be repeated -- over and over and over again -- until the American people get the message and understand what needs to be done to fix our schools!

More money is ABSOLUTELY NOT the answer. More money only leads to more waste and inefficiencies. We would get better schools by cutting the funds and putting other people in charge who can and will use new approaches to work within the budget while at the same time provide better education!

Unfortunately, most Americans have been MISLEAD into believing -- by both Democrats and Republicans -- that money is the answer. As long as politicians can keep the American voters believing this LIE, their task is easy. All they have to do to show Americans that they "really care" about and "support" better education is to dump another truckload of tax dollars on the system and the backs of the taxpayer. Obviously "they care"... they provided more money... they suckered and hoodwinked the taxpayers and voters once again... and will continue to do it every time until Americans wake up!

Democrat (Liberal) politicians and the national teachers unions work especially hard to mislead and fool the American people into believing that more money is all it takes for better schools. The national teachers unions tell the American people they are working for better schools -- ANOTHER LIE! The teachers unions are only looking for more money and benefits in their own pockets, and the Democrats, who receive most of the campaign money from their unions, are giving the teachers and unions what THEY want to buy those union and teacher's votes -- NOT what America and American's CHILDREN NEED! Any benefits to the education of America's children and students is purely coincidental and accidental!

School Vouchers... Contracted and privatized schools... New and creative thinking... New teaching techniques -- bring in the Video Professor... Better still, return to the "old" techniques of years ago that really worked that still work in other countries around... and that provide a real education!

Republicans... Get off those cushy chairs... Speak up -- loudly and often!... Educate the American people about what really needs to be done... Get the school vouchers moving... Take the politician's and union's wasteful paws out of the taxpayer's pockets... Put a stop to the Democrat's misleading lies and waste of taxpayer dollars!!!

Even more important to America... Remove America's schools and alleged "education" system from of the hands and control of the Liberal (Democrat) "educators" who use taxpayer dollars it to indoctrinate and brainwash our children with their own Liberal agenda, Liberal views, and Liberalism! This is what REALLY SCARES the Democrats... It is more important to Democrats to keep control of the schools for their brainwashing and indoctrination -- rather than provide a good education to America's children -- and FUTURE VOTERS!!!

AAR

Winning The Peace In Iraq.

A Democrat posting on Tom Delay's blog stated that the Bush administraion was unprepared to win the peace in Iraq because their assumptions about pre war conditions in Iraq were completely wrong.

I'll admit that President Bush and Congress failed in one respect. They failed to anticipate they would be fighting the terrorists in Iraq... and their supporters here in America! They failed to see just how far Democrats (A.K.A. Liberals) were willing to go in waging their war of hate, lies, and propaganda to win back the political power they [falsely] believe is rightfully theirs! "Winning The Peace", as Democrats want to call it, is much harder now that Democrats have encouraged, emboldened, and aided the terrorists and America's enemies around the world.

Have you ever tried to remove a large hornet nest, full of big, capable, angry, stinging hornets? It's a lot harder to remove the nest after someone has stirred up and energized the hornets. And, once those hornets are out of their nest, swarming around, and stinging anyone who comes close, it's not possible to just put them back in their nest.

The same is true of terrorists. It's much, much harder now to fight and eliminate the terrorists in Iraq after Democrats emboldened and encouraged them to start their campaign of terror and death. And, it's even harder still, now that Democrats have told them, and continue to preach every day, that the Democrats will get America's troops out of Iraq and leave it to the terrorists! And with Democrats in the majority, terrorists have more reason than ever for hope, knowing that the Democrats will be working in Congress to help their cause!

In the case of that hornet's nest, one can get badly stung. In the case of the terrorists, people -- American soldiers and Iraqi families -- get blown to bits, killed, and severely injured.

Democrats are the terrorist's answer to fighting America's military. Terrorists can't defeat our military, but Democrats can! All the terrorists need to do is just hold out, continue to blow up as many American soldiers and Iraqis each day as possible, and wait for the Democrats to do the rest... AS THEY HAVE PROMISED!

Why would or should terrorists give up now? Just keep that death toll rising to feed the Democrats and the liberal media! Victory is on the horizon and in sight -- perhaps just a Senate vote away! And if the terrorists begin to feel a little down, a little depressed, like they are being defeated, or thinking that maybe it is time to give up the fight, just wait, Democrats will give them more hope tomorrow!

Why would the terrorists want to give up now? They and Democrats are both working toward their common goal!

AAR

Many Americans Bought Democrat's "Believable Lies"

The fact is, many Americans bought into the Democrat's "believable lies" and "sound good" propaganda -- or at least enough misinformed and mislead voters did to give Democrats the few thousand votes they needed for their various wins. A landslide? A mandate? Not in the least!

I talked to some of those who voted for the Democrats. It was pathetic and sad to listen to them regurgitate the Democrat lies and propaganda -- almost word for word -- just as they heard from the Democrat's campaign ads. Would you believe some actually thought President Bush wanted to appoint activist judges who would force gay marriage on them and the American people? Those I talked to were equally confused about other issues as well. In reality they believed the same as President Bush, but were so totally mislead by the Democrats that they actually voted against their own beliefs!

Democrats (A.K.A. Liberals) repeated their "believable lies" over and over for six solid years until many of the American people finally bought into the liberal stream of garbage. After all, it must be true because that's all they heard for the six years while Republicans sat relatively quietly by and allowed it to continue. Repeat propaganda and lies often enough and people finally begin to believe it! Democrats are extremely good at their propaganda and brainwashing. Republicans allowed that to happen. That was their fault! Republicans and Conservatives must learn to do equally as well at fighting and countering it as Democrats are at producing it.

Why did Republicans sit back and allow the Democrat's to continue their incessant anti-Bush, anti-America, anti-everything hate, propaganda, and media campaigns largely unchallenged? Who knows! Perhaps Republicans believed Americans could and would see through the Democrat's obvious lies and propaganda. If so, that was and is a recipe for disaster and defeat... as happened in 2006! We can no longer rely on Americans to understand the obvious. Americans have lost that ability. Most Americans no longer can see the obvious and sort through the facts and lies. Too many believe what they are told as long as it "sounds" good and right. They don't consider the other side, the alternatives, or think about the consequences.

Most Americans are no longer capable of analyzing and thinking on their own. They don't pay attention to current events. They don't think about or analyze what they are told. Most can't. They lost that ability, along with the knowledge of real history, the Constitution, and most other subjects in the liberal controlled "education" [brainwashing] system. The voters bought into the media and Democratic propaganda and the lies they were told over and over and over, day after day after day. Republicans allowed those lies and propaganda to go largely unchallenged. Republicans and Conservatives -- all Americans -- are now paying for that!

Republicans and Conservatives must aggressively fight the Democrat lies and propaganda. If they continue to believe Americans can and will see through it, Republicans -- America -- will continue to lose elections!

Republicans must repeat the message over and over and over again. A few times is not enough.

AAR

Yes Democrats, Let's Talk About Iraq!

In their typical and predictable weak-minded, cut-and-run, raise-the-yellow-flag fashion, Democrats continue their anti-American efforts to encourage and embolden terrorists and America's enemies around the world.

As Tom Delay correctly stated on his blog about the Democrat's efforts to pass their "non-binding" resolution in support of America's retreat and surrender in Iraq (link) ...

"Senate Democrats (with aide from a cadre of feckless Republicans) are attempting to strike, in equal parts, their most impotent/damaging blow yet towards the defeat of the United States in the war on terror."

"All this resolution serves to do is undermine the troops, undermine the mission, undermine the president, and undermine the will of the American people to prosecute the war on terror with the vigor and determination necessary for victory. In short it is absolutely outrageous, and I wish the loyal Republican Minority in the Senate continued success in blocking its passage."

What does it take to wake up Republicans and make them fight, really fight the Democrats and their propaganda?

Republicans lost their voice six years ago... after they won the 2000 elections. Following that, Republicans essentially remained quiet while Democrats effectively waged their incessant and effective anti-Bush, anti-America, anti-everything propaganda and hate campaign. The Republican's failure to counter the Democratic lies and propaganda was one of, if not THE major factor in that Republican loss. It's time -- past time -- for Republicans to regain their voice and start fighting back!

Democrats want to talk about Iraq... Then let's talk about Iraq. Republicans must use each and every opportunity -- as they should have done for the past three years -- to tell and educate the American people about who and what the real problem is in fighting Iraqi terrorists and winning the war in Iraq... DEMOCRATS! As the Democrats have done, Republicans must repeat the message over and over and over again until the American people begin to realize and understand.

Democrats have been providing aid, comfort, and encouragement to Al Qaeda and Iraqi terrorists ever since before the 2004 elections when the Negative-9 Democratic presidential candidates and their rhetoric emboldened and encouraged the Iraqi terrorists to begin their campaign of terror, bombings, and killings.

Terrorists know they cannot defeat the United States militarily. Terrorists know their best and only hope to the defeat the United States in Iraq lies with the Democrats. Terrorists and Democrats share a common goal... Both want America to lose and both want America out of Iraq!

Terrorists and America's enemies read the news. Terrorists and America's enemies know and see how the Democrat's use and need the deaths and terror in Iraq to support their agenda and propaganda... and the terrorists are doing all they can to help the Democrats achieve their mutual goals. The terrorists are working hard to provide the daily fodder of bombings, killings, and wounding of American soldiers and Iraqi men, women, and children for the liberal news media and Democrats to use in their anti-war, cut-and-run, retreat propaganda.

Each time the terrorists attack, explode another bomb, and kill more American soldiers and Iraqi citizens, Democrats react in their usual and predictable manner. Democrats and the liberal media make it their headlines and rallying cry, and they increase their calls for retreat and surrender. The terrorists are pleased and happy! Tomorrow they will deliver even more attacks, bombings, and bodies for that day's headlines and propaganda!

The worst part is not that Democrats are demoralizing our troops fighting in Iraq. The worst part is that the Democrats are encouraging the terrorists to kill and wound our troops and Iraqi men, women, and children!!!

How many American soldiers and Iraqi citizens have been killed and injured directly and indirectly because of the Democrats? Let's have some House and Senate hearings on that!

America and the world will ultimately pay a dear and high price for the Democrats weak stand again terrorists and our enemies. How many of America's buildings and cities must be destroyed? How many million American citizens must be killed in future attacks before Americans throw the Democrats (A.K.A. Liberals) out... PERMANENTLY!

AAR

God is part of America. Keep Him here!

The founders of this nation and those who wrote and ratified the U.S. Constitution never intended for God to be removed from America and public life. God was everywhere. God was part of their life. They would never have dreamed of removing God, prayer, and religion from public view!

Thomas Jefferson and others practiced their religion openly, in public, and in America's schools, and they did so until activist liberal judges decided to ignore the facts, ignore history, and ignore the intent of the Constitution!

From the Library of Congress Website...

"It is no exaggeration to say that on Sundays in Washington during the administrations of Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) and of James Madison (1809-1817) the state became the church. Within a year of his inauguration, Jefferson began attending church services in the House of Representatives. Madison followed Jefferson's example, although unlike Jefferson, who rode on horseback to church in the Capitol, Madison came in a coach and four. Worship services in the House--a practice that continued until after the Civil War--were acceptable to Jefferson because they were nondiscriminatory and voluntary. Preachers of every Protestant denomination appeared. (Catholic priests began officiating in 1826.) As early as January 1806 a female evangelist, Dorothy Ripley, delivered a camp meeting-style exhortation in the House to Jefferson, Vice President Aaron Burr, and a 'crowded audience.' Throughout his administration Jefferson permitted church services in executive branch buildings. The Gospel was also preached in the Supreme Court chambers."

"The Old House of Representatives... Church services were held in what is now called Statuary Hall from 1807 to 1857. The first services in the Capitol, held when the government moved to Washington in the fall of 1800, were conducted in the 'hall' of the House in the north wing of the building. In 1801 the House moved to temporary quarters in the south wing, called the 'Oven,' which it vacated in 1804, returning to the north wing for three years. Services were conducted in the House until after the Civil War. The Speaker's podium was used as the preacher's pulpit."

It's time Americans return to the original intent of the Constitution and stop permitting activist liberal judges to make our laws... contrary to the very intent of our Constitution.

AAR

Diveristy and multi-culturalism are destroying America!!!

Diversity and multi-culturalism is destroying America!!!

Democrats (Liberals) are constantly preaching to Americans that diversity is a good thing, but in fact, diversity can be a very bad thing, especially when taken to the extremes. Diversity in excess, tears nations apart. It destroys the common culture, beliefs, goals, ideas, language, and cohesive elements that hold nations together and make them strong.

(More to add here.)


The following is from a speech given by former Colorado governor Richard Lamm on the perils of multiculturalism.

A Frightening Analysis

We all know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an immigration-overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor named Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration — both legal and illegal — was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.

Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"

"Here is how they do it," Lamm said: First to destroy America, "Turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."

Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

Third, "We could make the United States a 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved! Not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.'"

Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."

"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."

"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity! Unity is what it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games.

A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to over come two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell.

"E. Pluribus Unum" — From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."

"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits ~ make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'x! xenophobes' halt discussion and debate."

"Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."

In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said, "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."

There was no applause.

A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today. Every discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America — take note of California and other states — to date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance is strength."

Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy are deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.

Researchers Extract Embryonic Stem Cells From Amniotic Fluid

Researchers at Wake Forest University and Harvard University have extracted embryonic stem cells from the amniotic fluid of pregnant women. These cells hold much the same promise as embryonic stem cells -- WITHOUT KILLING the human embryo and fetus! (CNN article here.)

While this discovery could possibly avoid the controversy over destroying embryos for research, it's unlikely this will satisfy Democrats (A.K.A Liberals) for whom Abortion-On-Demand is a key element in their liberal agenda and programs. Democrats (Liberals) like Pelosi won't let a little thing like the existence of embryonic stem cells in amniotic fluid stop their ongoing efforts to force tax payer funding and government support for the destruction of living human embryos!

We already see the efforts to downplay these findings with arguments like: "...scientists still don't know exactly how many different cell types [are contained in amniotic fluid]...", or "...but they may not do as many tricks as embryonic stem cells...", and "...[while] they are fascinating subjects of study in their own right, they are not a substitute for human embryonic stem cells, which allow scientists to address a host of other interesting questions in early human development." (Apparently Democrats still need those aborted human fetuses for those "tricks" and "interesting questions"!)

Democrats continue to ignore the fact that President Bush supported the use of taxpayer funding for existing lines of embryonic stems cells, for umbilical stem cell research, and stem cell research from other sources -- just not from the destruction of human embryos! Democrats continue to ignore the fact that universities, research organizations, companies, and others are free to conduct embryonic stem cell research using private or non-taxpayer funding. Democrats continue to ignore the fact that Europe, Asia, and other countries are free to conduct embryonic stem cell research! Democrats continue to ignore the fact that their liberal supporters are free to contribute as much of their own money as they choose to embryonic stem cell research -- most likely as a tax exempt contribution -- which is amounts to taxpayer funded support, just without the money going through the IRS and Congress. Democrats continue to ignore the fact that much of the promising research involves adult stem cells and not embryonic stem cells.

Democrats won't acknowledge these or other facts because to do so would eliminate their touted use for all of those aborted fetuses created by their Abortion-On-Demand programs. And, Abortion-On-Demand is essential to the Liberal's (Democrat supported and enabled) free-sex-anything-goes lifestyle, their liberal agenda, their crusade against Christians, their support for activist law-giver judges who disregard our Constitution, and for their own religion of Liberalism!

In order to maintain support for the liberal agenda, Democrats must continue their disregard for human embryos and continue to make the American people believe human embryos are not really "life", but rather just "things" and "commodities" -- to be bought, sold, destroyed, and used in any manner that suits their own views.

To do otherwise could jeopardize the Democrat's own liberal agenda!

AAR

Pollution May Control Global Warming

Perhaps we need more pollution to counter the "alleged" greenhouse effect from carbon dioxide, or at least that's what some scientists are now proposing... and as any good liberal can attest, if a scientist says it, it must be so... it must be good!


Fighting global warming with pollution

"...prominent scientists, including a Nobel Prize winner, have come up with a controversial proposal during the UN conference on climate change. They raise the idea of creating a 'shade' of pollution to cool the earth. It's like creating an umbrella of black smoke to prevent the sun's heat from reaching the earth. It has to be reintroduced regularly, as the pollutants fall back into the Earth through rain and other means. It is a temporary relief while experts are looking for more permanent ways of dealing with the problem."


Could smog protect against global warming?

"...If the sun warms the Earth too dangerously, the time may come to draw the shade."

"The 'shade' would be a layer of pollution deliberately spewed into the atmosphere to help cool the planet. This over-the-top idea comes from prominent scientists, among them a Nobel laureate. The reaction here at the U.N. conference on climate change is a mix of caution, curiosity and some resignation to such 'massive and drastic' operations, as the chief U.N. climatologist describes them."

"Serious people are taking Crutzen's idea seriously. This weekend, NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., hosts a closed-door, high-level workshop on the global haze proposal and other 'geoengineering' ideas for fending off climate change."


Fighting the Greenhouse Effect with One Giant Sulfur Cloud

"Tom Wigley, a senior U.S. government climatologist, agrees with Crutzen’s idea. He used a computer-generated model to determine that an estimated five million tons of sulfur injected into the atmosphere yearly would lower the temperature by 0.9 degrees."

"Wigley believes after further testing for safety and efficacy, this method could be used until carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are reduced. Sulfur dioxide would be used because it reflects solar radiation from entering the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide, on the other hand, keeps heat from escaping."

...

Perhaps we have been doing the wrong thing by trying to reduce the particles of carbon (smoke) in car exhausts, smoke stacks, and other sources. By insisting that we eliminate all of that black smoke, perhaps environmentalists have in fact been making the problem worse -- eliminating the particles that would offset the carbon dioxide.

If the dust cloud from a volcano can reduce the amount of sunshine reaching the earth and reduce global temperatures, a good thick cloud of smoke should do the same thing -- offsetting the "alleged" increase in temperature from carbon dioxide.

So... let's get to building some electric power plants and factories with tall smoke stacks and start countering the carbon dioxide. That should stop the constant complaining from the liberal left about the greenhouse effect!!!

AAR

Comment Policy

This is a Conservative Blog for the purpose of expressing conservative opinions and views.

This blog is not a forum for Democrats (A.K.A. Liberals) to exercise their irresponsible free speech rights.

This blog is not a forum for Democrats (Liberals) to repeat and restate their views, opinions, misrepresentations, suggestions, and propaganda or to espouse the liberal agenda or to preach the religion of Liberalism.

Comments will generally be limited to members; although, from time to time, comments may be permitted on selected topics from non-members.

Comments from non-members will be moderated to prevent cluttering this blog with the usual Democrat (Liberal) propaganda and one line "believable lies"!

Comments may be deleted by the moderator or administrators at my or their discretion!

AAR

Objectives

Objectives: To be developed.

Purpose

Purpose:

To defeat Liberalism and the Democrats who enable and support it.

To...