Democrat Efforts To Undermine The Surge Are Working!

As I said in a prior post...

The Democrats (Liberals) have, in effect, told the terrorists that if they will kill more American troops, kill more Iraqi families, increase their terrorism -- and just hang in there a little longer -- their efforts and violence will provide the headlines and body counts needed to assure Democrats the support and votes to cut the funding for our troops and force America's defeat, retreat, surrender, and failure!!!

Predictably, terrorists have ramped up their violence, and our soldiers are paying the price.

The Associated Press (AP), Jun 29 2007, reported...

"BAGHDAD (AP) - A huge bomb explosion followed by a hail of gunfire and grenades killed five U.S. soldiers, the military said Friday. The attack came as the Pentagon tallied up the deadliest three-month period for Americans since the war began."

"Those deaths brought to 99 the number of U.S. troops killed this month, according to an Associated Press count. The toll for the past three months-329-made it the deadliest quarter for U.S. troops in Iraq since the March 2003 invasion. That surpasses the 316 soldiers killed during November 2004 to January 2005...."

It must be truly disheartening for our troops -- risking and giving their lives to stabilize Iraq and defeat our enemies -- while Democrats (Liberals) knowingly or unknowingly -- through their words, actions, and deeds -- continue to provide aid, hope, and encouragement to the terrorists... just as they have done throughout the war!

Why should terrorists give up? Why should terrorists stop their violence and killing?

Terrorists know all too well that the greater the violence and the more they kill our troops and Iraqi families, the louder Democrats (Liberals) will cry out for America's defeat, retreat, and surrender!

The Taliban, too, will increase their violence, terrorism, and suicide bombings -- killing more American soldiers and Afghanistani families -- as they work to provide the headlines Democrats will need (and use!) to defeat America in Afghanistan as well!

How can America ever hope to defeat terrorism while Democrats (Liberals) are working so hard to defeat America?

Terrorists can't defeat America's military. Terrorists are counting on the Democrats to do that for them!

DEMOCRATS... REWARDING terrorists for their BAD BEHAVIOR ! ! !

AAR

Amnesty Program Will Not Stop Illegal Immigration

Any form of amnesty program will ultimately cost American taxpayers hundreds of billions, more likely trillions, of dollars.

American citizens wait in line for treatment while illegal immigrants get health care ahead of them. And if the illegal immigrants can just make it to America and have their child in an American hospital at the American taxpayer's expense, they are locked in. That child is a U.S. citizen and their parents will likely never be deported -- illegal immigrants or not!

If those millions of illegal immigrants are given "guest worker" status, they will most likely qualify for welfare at the American taxpayer's expense. They will bring their families too, which will require even more welfare. And, if they are here legally, it is even more likely they will have even more children who automatically become U.S. citizens which will guarantee that the parents never have to leave American, even if their "guest worker" status requires it!

In addition to welfare, the American taxpayer will have to pay to build more schools for the children of the "guest workers". The American taxpayer will have to pay for the bureaucracy to support the "guest worker" program. The American taxpayer will have to pay for their interpreters and legal costs. The list goes on, and on, and on, and ...

Once their status becomes legal, will they continue to work those low paid jobs that American won't do? Not likely. There will be attempts to unionize them, to increase their pay, to force employers to provide them with health insurance, etc. If they are willing to march by the hundreds of thousands for their "rights" while illegal workers, just think of the marches we can expect if they are here legally. They will have "rights" and will demand even more!

Will illegal immigration stop if we grant "guest worker" status to those millions of workers who are already here illegally? No! If the illegal workers don't recognize our laws now, are those who don't qualify as "guest workers" going to stop crossing our borders? No!

Granting "guest worker" status to the millions of illegal workers will not solve the problem... but, it will assure that we have even more millions of low paid immigrants here being subsidized by the American taxpayer!

The Heritage Foundation's Robert Rector calculates that during their lifetimes, they will likely receive "$2.5 TRILLION more in government services than they will pay in taxes." Among those benefits are Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income, public housing, subsidized college education and Social Security Disability Insurance.

Look at what uncontrolled immigration has done to France and Europe. America doesn't need to create those problems here!

AAR

Democrats Undermine The Surge And Our Troops

The Democrats have undermined the "surge" and America's soldiers in Iraq, just as they have undermined our troops throughout the war!

The DUMB Democrats have told the terrorists that if the "surge" doesn't work, Democrats will do all they can to cut the funding, pull the troops, defeat America, and leave Iraq to the terrorists!

The DUMB Democrats have, in effect, told the terrorists that the best way they can help Democrats convince Americans the surge isn't working -- and the war against terrorism is lost -- is to ramp up the violence, bombings, killing, kidnapping, and terrorism -- and most of all -- kill more American soldiers!

The DUMB Democrats have, in effect, told the terrorists that if they will kill more American troops, kill more Iraqi families, increase their terrorism -- and just hang in there a few more months -- their efforts will assure that Democrats have the support and votes they need to cut the funding and force America's defeat, retreat, surrender, and failure!!!

Democrats need those daily reports of violence, terrorism, bombings, and American deaths to make the American people falsely believe they must accept defeat at the hands of the terrorists. Terrorists know that, and they are anxious and willing to provide the violence and deaths Democrats want and need for those daily news and media headlines.

May 2007 was among the deadliest months for our soldiers in Iraq! Why?

...Because the terrorists are doing what the DUMB Democrats, in effect, told them to do!

This summer too will be among the deadliest for our troops, their families, and Iraqi families! Why?

...Because the terrorists are doing what DUMB Democrats, in effect, told the terrorists to do! Ramp up the violence and kill more American soldiers!!!

The Taliban have also seen how Democrats use the reports of violence and deaths of American soldiers to undermine and destroy America's will to win.

Having seen this, the Taliban will be increasing their violence and terrorism, increasing their suicide bombings, killing more American soldiers, and killing more Afghanistani families to provide the headlines Democrats need to defeat America in Afghanistan as well!

Terrorists can't defeat America's military. Terrorists are counting on the Democrats to do that for them!

DUMB Democrats... REWARDING terrorists for their BAD BEHAVIOR ! ! !

AAR

No Constitutional Right Or Protection For Gay Marriage

Don't be mislead by Democrat (Liberals).

There is no Constitutional right or protection for gay marriage. Once again, activist LAW-GIVER Liberal judges are UNCONSTITUTIONALLY changing the meaning and intend of the Constitution to suit their own personal views and beliefs!

LAW-GIVER judges have UNCONSTITUTIONALLY usurped (illegally taken) the powers assigned to Congress and are "de facto" Amending the Constitution by their rulings and decisions -- contrary to the AMENDMENT PROCESS clearly STATED in the Constitution itself!

As long as the American people permit LAW-GIVER judges to change the meaning and intent of the Constitution, WE HAVE NO CONSTITUTION!

The American people must STOP these activist Liberal LAW-GIVER judges and RESTORE the CONSTITUTION!


A little history...

Sodomy [without which there would be no gay marriage] has, until recently, been viewed and treated as a major crime. When this nation was formed, sodomy carried harsh penalties, including extended jail terms, life in prison, and even the death penalty! (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1786, Pennsylvania became the first of the 13 American states to drop the death penalty for sodomy. The new sentence was 10 years in prison and the forfeiture of all property. (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1788, at the time the U.S. Constitution was ratified, sodomy was a major crime in all states, with punishment ranging from extended jail sentences up to and including the death penalty in at least nine of the states! (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1791, at the time the Bill of Rights, the first Ten Amendments, to the Constitution was ratified, sodomy was a major crime in all states, with punishment ranging from extended jail sentences up to and including the death penalty! Nine of the original thirteen states still provided the death penalty for sodomy. (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1868, at the time the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, all but 5 of the 37 States in the Union had criminal sodomy laws up to and including life in prison and the death penalty. Four states still specified the death penalty for sodomy and eleven states provided a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 1986 the Supreme Court heard the case of Bowers v. Hardwick. The Supreme Court upheld Georgia's sodomy laws. The Justices ruled that the practice of "homosexual sodomy" was not a "fundamental right." The majority opinion, written by Byron White, pointed out that "sodomy was a criminal offense at common law and was forbidden by the laws of the original 13 States when they ratified the Bill of Rights." It went on to observe that "in 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, all but 5 of the 37 States in the Union had criminal sodomy laws. In fact, until 1961, all 50 States outlawed sodomy." (No right or protection for gay marriage!)

In 2003, only 13 years later, however, in the case of Lawrence v. Texas, the activist Liberal majority on the Supreme Court struck down the Texas sodomy law, reversing the 1986 decision in which the high court had correctly upheld the Georgia statute -- not finding a constitutional protection of sexual privacy.

In the 2003 case, the activist Liberal majority on the Supreme Courts reversed history, reversed our nation's laws, and illegally and unconstitutionally proclaimed that the framers of the 14th Amendment's "due process clause" intended it to protect "liberty of the person both in its spatial and more transcendent dimensions." clearly contrary to the history of the laws of the United States, and ALL rulings prior to it! (Judicial Activism at its finest.)

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who had voted with the majority in Bowers, agreed with the final outcome of the case, but did not join the court in reversing the high court's 1986 decision in the similar Georgia case Bowers v. Hardwick. Justice O'Connor said that she would not overrule Bowers. Instead, she would invalidate the Texas law because it applied only to same-sex couples. For her, the Georgia law in Bowers was different because it applied both to opposite-sex and same-sex couples.

Justice Scalia, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thomas, dissented. He said that the Court was not justified in overruling the precedent of Bowers v. Hardwick. Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion argued that states should be able to make the moral judgment that homosexual conduct is wrong and embody that judgment in criminal statutes.

The 2003 ruling was an unconstitutional ruling by activist Liberal judges, and clearly contrary to the history of the laws of the United States, and ALL rulings prior to it. In effect, the judges AMENDED [de facto] the U.S. CONSTITUTION in a manner contrary to that prescribed and permitted by the U.S. CONSTITUTION itself! The high court should have upheld the Texas law and left the decision to the states where it belonged.

But, guess what, when we permit judges to make our laws and amend the Constitution, it permits future judges to do the same thing! Since Liberals choose to ignore and abort the Constitution, who knows how a court might rule on this matter some time in the future.

By permitting activist judges to use the concept of a "living" Constitution to amend the Constitution, we in effect, have NO Constitutional GUARANTEES, RIGHTS, and PROTECTIONS!

The Constitution means only what a group of judges declares that it means at the time of their latest ruling!

Judicial activism is destroying our Constitution and our nation!

A "living" Constitution is a DEAD Constitution!

AAR