Pollution Is The Solution... to Global Warming!
Perhaps we need MORE POLLUTION to counter the "alleged" greenhouse effect from carbon dioxide, or at least that's what some scientists are now proposing... and as any good Democrat (Liberal) can attest, if a scientist says it, it must be so... it must be good!
"... prominent scientists, including a Nobel Prize winner, have come up with a controversial proposal during the UN conference on climate change. They raise the idea of creating a 'shade' of pollution to cool the earth. It's like creating an umbrella of black smoke to prevent the sun's heat from reaching the earth. It has to be reintroduced regularly, as the pollutants fall back into the Earth through rain and other means. It is a temporary relief while experts are looking for more permanent ways of dealing with the problem."
You can find other stories on the "pollution proposal" using Google. I've also included a few more links on the subject in one of my earlier posts, "Pollution May Control Global Warming" (clickable link below).
http://aaropinionsmore.blogspot.com/2006/11/perhaps-we-need-more-pollution-to.html
People really do need to read and be told about the solar cycles, historical climate change, historical periods of warming and cooling, and understand that THE SUN itself has a great deal to say about how hot or cold the Earth and it's climate are at any point in time! Democrats (Liberals) don't want that message discussed, however, because that would keep their message of fear and hysteria from having its (their) desired effect! Perhaps "greenhouse gases" are "contributing" to the increase in global temperatures, but just how much?
If sea levels are rising, Democrats (Liberals) will quickly blame and chastise a person who pours a bucket of water in the ocean and accuse them of contributing to the rise in sea level. True, that bucket of water may have "contributed" to the rise in sea levels, but the effect of that bucket of water and it's infinitesimal impact on the total picture is lost in rounding, and in that case, would be ZERO!
And if the Earth is warming, is that all bad? Perhaps the net effect will be positive! Yes, maybe New Orleans had better consider building and re-building above sea level, but perhaps much of the rest of the world will benefit and more plants will flourish!
I'm not saying that we don't need to look at and work toward reducing our use of fossil fuels -- from an economical standpoint if nothing else -- but it needs to be done in a rational manner, over time, and considering factors such as the economic impact. Democrats don't want that approach. Democrats want to create panic as a means of getting it done THEIR WAY!
And what are we going to do when the sun "decides" it's time for a period of global cooling -- another ice age? Rush to burn more fossil fuels and produce more greenhouse gases? Perhaps that cloud of soot and carbon IS THE ANSWER -- to both problems. Since the particles settle out over time, we can add more particles when we need shade to cool the Earth and let them settle out when we need less shade and a warmer climate...
...Whatever DEMOCRATS (LIBERALS) -- in their infinite and all knowing wisdom -- decide and mandate is BEST for the rest of us!!!
AAR