Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Diveristy and multi-culturalism are destroying America!!!

Diversity and multi-culturalism is destroying America!!!

Democrats (Liberals) are constantly preaching to Americans that diversity is a good thing, but in fact, diversity can be a very bad thing, especially when taken to the extremes. Diversity in excess, tears nations apart. It destroys the common culture, beliefs, goals, ideas, language, and cohesive elements that hold nations together and make them strong.

(More to add here.)


The following is from a speech given by former Colorado governor Richard Lamm on the perils of multiculturalism.

A Frightening Analysis

We all know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an immigration-overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor named Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration — both legal and illegal — was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.

Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"

"Here is how they do it," Lamm said: First to destroy America, "Turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."

Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

Third, "We could make the United States a 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved! Not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.'"

Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."

"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."

"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity! Unity is what it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games.

A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to over come two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell.

"E. Pluribus Unum" — From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."

"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits ~ make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'x! xenophobes' halt discussion and debate."

"Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."

In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said, "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."

There was no applause.

A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today. Every discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America — take note of California and other states — to date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance is strength."

Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy are deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Researchers Extract Embryonic Stem Cells From Amniotic Fluid

Researchers at Wake Forest University and Harvard University have extracted embryonic stem cells from the amniotic fluid of pregnant women. These cells hold much the same promise as embryonic stem cells -- WITHOUT KILLING the human embryo and fetus! (CNN article here.)

While this discovery could possibly avoid the controversy over destroying embryos for research, it's unlikely this will satisfy Democrats (A.K.A Liberals) for whom Abortion-On-Demand is a key element in their liberal agenda and programs. Democrats (Liberals) like Pelosi won't let a little thing like the existence of embryonic stem cells in amniotic fluid stop their ongoing efforts to force tax payer funding and government support for the destruction of living human embryos!

We already see the efforts to downplay these findings with arguments like: "...scientists still don't know exactly how many different cell types [are contained in amniotic fluid]...", or "...but they may not do as many tricks as embryonic stem cells...", and "...[while] they are fascinating subjects of study in their own right, they are not a substitute for human embryonic stem cells, which allow scientists to address a host of other interesting questions in early human development." (Apparently Democrats still need those aborted human fetuses for those "tricks" and "interesting questions"!)

Democrats continue to ignore the fact that President Bush supported the use of taxpayer funding for existing lines of embryonic stems cells, for umbilical stem cell research, and stem cell research from other sources -- just not from the destruction of human embryos! Democrats continue to ignore the fact that universities, research organizations, companies, and others are free to conduct embryonic stem cell research using private or non-taxpayer funding. Democrats continue to ignore the fact that Europe, Asia, and other countries are free to conduct embryonic stem cell research! Democrats continue to ignore the fact that their liberal supporters are free to contribute as much of their own money as they choose to embryonic stem cell research -- most likely as a tax exempt contribution -- which is amounts to taxpayer funded support, just without the money going through the IRS and Congress. Democrats continue to ignore the fact that much of the promising research involves adult stem cells and not embryonic stem cells.

Democrats won't acknowledge these or other facts because to do so would eliminate their touted use for all of those aborted fetuses created by their Abortion-On-Demand programs. And, Abortion-On-Demand is essential to the Liberal's (Democrat supported and enabled) free-sex-anything-goes lifestyle, their liberal agenda, their crusade against Christians, their support for activist law-giver judges who disregard our Constitution, and for their own religion of Liberalism!

In order to maintain support for the liberal agenda, Democrats must continue their disregard for human embryos and continue to make the American people believe human embryos are not really "life", but rather just "things" and "commodities" -- to be bought, sold, destroyed, and used in any manner that suits their own views.

To do otherwise could jeopardize the Democrat's own liberal agenda!

AAR

Sunday, January 7, 2007

Pollution May Control Global Warming

Perhaps we need more pollution to counter the "alleged" greenhouse effect from carbon dioxide, or at least that's what some scientists are now proposing... and as any good liberal can attest, if a scientist says it, it must be so... it must be good!


Fighting global warming with pollution

"...prominent scientists, including a Nobel Prize winner, have come up with a controversial proposal during the UN conference on climate change. They raise the idea of creating a 'shade' of pollution to cool the earth. It's like creating an umbrella of black smoke to prevent the sun's heat from reaching the earth. It has to be reintroduced regularly, as the pollutants fall back into the Earth through rain and other means. It is a temporary relief while experts are looking for more permanent ways of dealing with the problem."


Could smog protect against global warming?

"...If the sun warms the Earth too dangerously, the time may come to draw the shade."

"The 'shade' would be a layer of pollution deliberately spewed into the atmosphere to help cool the planet. This over-the-top idea comes from prominent scientists, among them a Nobel laureate. The reaction here at the U.N. conference on climate change is a mix of caution, curiosity and some resignation to such 'massive and drastic' operations, as the chief U.N. climatologist describes them."

"Serious people are taking Crutzen's idea seriously. This weekend, NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., hosts a closed-door, high-level workshop on the global haze proposal and other 'geoengineering' ideas for fending off climate change."


Fighting the Greenhouse Effect with One Giant Sulfur Cloud

"Tom Wigley, a senior U.S. government climatologist, agrees with Crutzen’s idea. He used a computer-generated model to determine that an estimated five million tons of sulfur injected into the atmosphere yearly would lower the temperature by 0.9 degrees."


"Wigley believes after further testing for safety and efficacy, this method could be used until carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are reduced. Sulfur dioxide would be used because it reflects solar radiation from entering the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide, on the other hand, keeps heat from escaping."

...

Perhaps we have been doing the wrong thing by trying to reduce the particles of carbon (smoke) in car exhausts, smoke stacks, and other sources. By insisting that we eliminate all of that black smoke, perhaps environmentalists have in fact been making the problem worse -- eliminating the particles that would offset the carbon dioxide.

If the dust cloud from a volcano can reduce the amount of sunshine reaching the earth and reduce global temperatures, a good thick cloud of smoke should do the same thing -- offsetting the "alleged" increase in temperature from carbon dioxide.

So... let's get to building some electric power plants and factories with tall smoke stacks and start countering the carbon dioxide. That should stop the constant complaining from the liberal left about the greenhouse effect!!!

AAR

Monday, January 1, 2007

Comment Policy

This is a Conservative Blog for the purpose of expressing conservative opinions and views.

This blog is not a forum for Democrats (A.K.A. Liberals) to exercise their irresponsible free speech rights.

This blog is not a forum for Democrats (Liberals) to repeat and restate their views, opinions, misrepresentations, suggestions, and propaganda or to espouse the liberal agenda or to preach the religion of Liberalism.

Comments will generally be limited to members; although, from time to time, comments may be permitted on selected topics from non-members.

Comments from non-members will be moderated to prevent cluttering this blog with the usual Democrat (Liberal) propaganda and one line "believable lies"!

Comments may be deleted by the moderator or administrators at my or their discretion!

AAR

Objectives

Objectives: To be developed.

Purpose

Purpose:

To defeat Liberalism and the Democrats who enable and support it.

To...